Legal Turmoil for Tamil Superstar: Sangeetha Vijay Files for Divorce in Chengalpattu Court
Sangeetha Vijay has officially moved a Chengalpattu court to seek a divorce from actor and politician Joseph Vijay Chandrashekar, citing an irretrievable breakdown of their marriage. The high-profile filing under the Special Marriage Act includes requests for permanent alimony and a media injunction to protect the privacy of their children.
According to the legal filings, Sangeetha Vijay has alleged that the marriage has suffered an irretrievable breakdown, specifically citing the actor’s alleged involvement in an extra-marital relationship with an actress as a primary grievance. The history of their union, as detailed in the plea, traces back to a registration in the United Kingdom on July 10, 1998, followed by a traditional ceremony in Chennai on August 25, 1999, conducted in accordance with Hindu rites. Despite the longevity of their partnership, the petition suggests that internal friction has persisted for several years; document records indicate that multiple attempts to reach an amicable settlement through legal correspondence occurred between late 2021 and early 2022, with a second wave of failed negotiations spanning from August 2024 to February 2025.
Beyond the decree of divorce, the legal action outlines significant financial and residential demands. Sangeetha has requested the court to grant her the right to reside in their matrimonial home until the final disposal of the case, or alternatively, that the actor provide suitable alternate accommodation. Furthermore, she is seeking permanent alimony that reflects the substantial income and elevated social standing of the actor. The petition also places a heavy emphasis on the protection of the family's reputation, with a specific request for the court to conduct all future proceedings in camera. This move aims to restrain media outlets and social media platforms from disseminating sensitive details of the case, a measure Sangeetha argues is essential to safeguard the dignity and privacy of both the parties and their children.
As the legal machinery begins to move, the case is slated for its first major hearing in April 2026. The timing of this development is particularly poignant given Vijay’s dual role as a cinema icon and a burgeoning force in the political landscape, where personal conduct often intersects with public perception. As the court prepares to weigh the allegations and the subsequent demands for maintenance and costs, the outcome of this case promises to be a landmark moment in the personal history of one of the region's most influential families, potentially redefining the private boundaries of public figures in the digital age.

Comment List